"...which will include a Statement on the outcome of the recent Primates meeting in Canterbury..."
hmmm... the reception of that will be interesting...
A motion of complaint or censure might be more apposite, to demonstrate repudiation of the way lesbian, trans, bi and gay people have been hurt by our Church.
It would also be interesting to raise the question of why the principle of the rejected Anglican Covenant seems to have been effectively re-asserted by the Primates, and on whose authority, because it wasn't the Synod's.
Domination of conscience continues, however charmingly it is spun.
As I have written before on this site I hope that the debate on Tuesday 16th February (GS2016) featuring the Bishop of Chester and the Moderator of the general Assembly of the Church of Scotland will begin with an apology to the Scottish Episcopal Church?
The Church of England is guilty of 'border crossing' without consent and the whole exercise is a huge embarrassment however the Bishop of Chester spins it.
Redemption could be achieved by the presence of the Primus of the Scottish Episcopal Church in a conciliatory and forgiving mood ... but that's not going to happen
The agenda item about Shared Conversations at General Synod in February says they are about Spirituality, Scripture and Mission. When did they stop being about Scripture, Mission and Human Sexuality, which was what they were called when the Regional Conversations began?
Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.
Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to
the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill
the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select
'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No
third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical,
advertising, or other purposes.