"...offering safe space in which to address misunderstanding of the “other”..."
I've just tripped over the broken remains of my irony meter.
I was struck by the lack of humility in the reference to "MY reconciliation ministry" (emphasis added).
Is there really no way we can follow the Conservatives, Labour and UKIP and have a leadership election?
Poor woman. She'll soon realise she's failed when she talks to members of Anglican 'Mainstream'.
Kate For what it is worth I don't read it that way at all. She has a ministry of reconciliation. Can't she say so? And I simply don't understand your second comment about holding elections like political parties. Do you mean we should hold church-wide elections for anyone appointed onto the Lambeth staff?
David R I think you misunderstand. "My reconciliation ministry" are the words of the ABC not the new advisor. And the rather cheeky but funny reference to holding elections was surely a reference to Augustine's successor not the Lambeth staff.
Ah - apologies. The mist is clearing.
Reconciliation in Christ and his liberating Gospel or political correctness?
Sadly the word reconciliation is now as hi-jacked as evangelical.
This is putting the cart before the horses: you reconcile *after* discrimination has ended, not before; and the victims of discrimination have every right to choose not to.
Gotta be the first time that an institutionally homophobic organization refers to "safe spaces," just as Welby is punctilious about using "LGBTI." Say all the right things, while continuing to do all the wrong ones. Talk about schizophrenic!
David, I sincerely hope not because it seems to be contrary to the teaching of 1 Corinthians 10.
Reconciliation means reconciling oneself with Welby's strategy for the Communion. Good disagreement? Agree with me or else face the consequences. If it means there are to be no safe spaces for LGBT ministers, even in supposedly liberal dioceses, then so be it: that's absolutely central to the strategy for unity with GAFCON. Another Primates Meeting is pencilled in for October next year apparently. Forget 'shared conversations', he has no hope of getting them all to attend unless CofE bishops are absolutely uncompromising in relation to the HoB's Pastoral Statement on same-sex marriage.
The world needs more interfaith sharing, not less. When we hold different beliefs, we still share common humanity, and the command to love crosses faith boundaries. Yes, we should be grateful for the opportunities to eat together and journey together, as - in common with one another - we face the challenges of building community, helping our neighbours, caring for our elderly, encouraging our young.
Reconciliation of this kind, between faiths, and between communities in places of strife, is desperately needed.
I enjoy worshipping and studying at East London Mosque when I am in London. I am transsexual, I am respected, and I am offered really appreciated hospitality and welcome.
The epithet 'Allah is all-loving' occurs more frequently than any other in the Quran. The epithet 'God is Love' is a dominant statement in the Bible. And both religions know the yearning for divine peace.
In our bitterly-divided world, and our economically-divided society, reconciliation is needed more than ever. Reconciliation with justice and reconciliation in living relationships between people of many faiths (and people with non-religious convictions too).
There is a vast chasm of difference between inter-faith dialogue and co-operation which should be encouraged, and the archbishop hosting - or even attending - an iftar to break a Ramadan fast.
There is a very sharp line between being respectful of the observances and customs of another religion and participating in, or giving the impression of, participation in, the observances and customs of another religion. That line absolutely should not be crossed by anyone in ordained orders.
Fasting is a custom of the Christian religion too. As is hospitality. I see absolutely nothing wrong with fasting and sharing food, in solidarity with one another, and it highlights things we have in common.
Considering the mayhem caused around the world by religious extremists, I'd have thought that idealistic young people and faith leaders joining together - expressing the moderate values of their faiths or beliefs - eating together, being friends together... is far more constructive than the kind of bunker mentality that extremists adopt.
Christian leaders setting an example seems to me like a positive thing. What are we afraid of when we get alongside one another, acknowledge God together, share food, share friendship? Each of us may approach God in our own ways, and our own traditions, but we are travellers together on this earth, all facing suffering, all facing mortality, and if - along our distinctive paths - we occasionally come together, I think that is lovely.
Jesus was sometimes looked at askance for interacting with people who seemed 'not like us'. He even attributed godly virtues to people who were routinely seen as 'other'. He broke the rules about the Sabbath (or fulfilled them)... and I think that, in opening to the love of God by sharing and by friendship, and hospitality... we are fulfilling the law, not breaking it.
Some customs and practices of other religions are admirable. In drawing together, and sharing values and expressions of faith, we witness to the love and goodness of God, and in doing so we promote moderation and the sanity of love, in the face of a religious evil and extremism that threatens terror on every side.
Love your neighbour... it doesn't get much more basic and fundamental than that. And part of loving, is respecting and opening up and trying to understand and sharing with the person we seek to love, to show value and worth to them - who they actually are, and the values and things that are precious to them.
I have sternly criticised Julian on some previous occasions (for example the tawdry way he misrepresented the ACC meeting earlier this year)... but on this occasion, he looks happy and generous-hearted and kind in the picture, and I think it was excellent that he shared iftar with all those young people and leaders of various faiths.
Oops - Justin, not Julian! *typo*
"Reconciliation in Christ and his liberating Gospel or political correctness?"
What I (gratefully) call the former, RIW, you would probably dismiss as the latter. Conversely, anyone who speaks of the latter, usually seems to be badly in need of experiencing (for a change) the former.
Kyrie eleison. Lord, grant us all more Light!
Kate: Surely you are not suggesting that the mere sharing of a meal with those of another faith (even a meal with some religious connotations) is tantamount to eating the flesh of a sacrifice? In your eyes, did I commit a sin when I accepted my friend's invitation to his Seder?
Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.
Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to
the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill
the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select
'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No
third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical,
advertising, or other purposes.