Comments: Truro diocese publishes Jeremy Dowling case review

Here are four brief points which seem to be going missing in the current safeguarding narrative.

First, the treatment of survivors should not principally be the business of remote functionaries, but rather of pastoral presences - local empathy, resource, commitment etc

Second, keeping people safe from harm only happens on the front-line - the safeguarding teams pick up the problems, but the front line prevents problems (or not, as the case may be). It is no good creating systems which rely on the third line of defence to sort the issue.

Third, the training given on safeguarding highlights what we don't do in other areas - compulsory training and awareness rolled out nationally - what would that look like if it were in a theological or pastoral or ministerial field? Can't we learn from that?

Fourth, that responding well to survivors is a key part of the core mission of the church. Preventing harm too. This is not a separate topic from mission, it is intrinsic to authentic mission, and needs to be named as such.

Posted by Mark Bennet at Wednesday, 30 May 2018 at 8:41pm BST
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.