Thinking Anglicans

just thinking…

Having lived for ten years in the North-East of England, I returned to Dublin (which I had left in 1990) just over three years ago. The Dublin I had left was really still a provincial town, and its inhabitants lacked the self-assured arrogance of those of some capital cities. But its community was also still far from being at ease in the modern world: the 1980s were marked in many ways by very public struggles in which the Roman Catholic church fought, and generally vanquished, what people elsewhere took for granted: contraception, divorce, homosexuality.

When I returned I encountered a very different city, and a very different country. The demure city whose pulse was hardly in evidence has become an in-your-face, secular, materialistic community. Churches in urban parishes which had attracted 90 per cent of the population to their Masses are now lucky if the get 10 per cent. A new RC archbishop feels the obvious need to begin his prelature by offering apologies to all and sundry on behalf of his church.

Anglicans have been beneficiaries, to some extent. For the first time in over a century or so the Church of Ireland is growing, and in some parishes it is growing fast. Young affluent-looking families (who will often still be declaring they are ‘Catholic’ on the census form) make the Anglican cathedral or parish church their spiritual home. And why? Because, as one said recently in a TV interview, ‘here is a denomination which understands the new millennium and can combine the spirit of the new age with the best of the old tradition’. And another said that ‘Anglicans manage to be religious without being obviously unreasonable’.

Maybe that’s too rosy a picture, and maybe the more familiar pattern of decline will return. But I don’t believe that a born-again dogmatism — whatever its direction — is a likely agent of continuing growth. Fundamentalists comfort those who cannot quite face the world as it is; but most people whose main instinct these days is to give religion a miss will run a mile if they sense a dogma around the corner. We need to speak a different language — still capable of being expressed in thees and thous, by the way — which engages the mind, refreshes the senses and shows the way forward.

3
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
Smith KellyGerry LynchDavid Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
David
Guest
David

The last paragraph of this story is one of the most succinct and “spot-on” statements of what will, and won’t, grow a church that I’ve had the pleasure of reading lately.

Dogmatic fundamentalism is a dead end. Sure, there will probably always be a small percentage of the population who wants that. But do you really want to fight over that small group with all the other denominations, or do you want to reach out to the majority and truly grow your church ?

Gerry Lynch
Guest

Spot on Ferdinand. Certainly my own reasons for moving from Rome to Anglicanism (North of the border) were no different from your prosperous Dubs. Ireland still has a strong Christian foundation – but the Roman Catholic Church has become a cold house for many of us.

For all Anglicanism frustrates me, after 7 years, I’ve still no regrets about making the switch.

Smith Kelly
Guest

After two years in Washington, I often long for the realism and sincerity of Hollywood.