Thinking Anglicans

What were the bishops doing?

Dave Walker has the answer:

Cartoon: What the bishops were doing whilst civil partnerships in church were being voted on

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
choirboyfromhell
choirboyfromhell
10 years ago

Hiding in the closet!!!!!

Pluralist
10 years ago

Dave Walker does not do likenesses but I have to say the one on the bottom left looks like John Saxbee. But then he would not be washing his hair but ‘eating for Jesus’ as he calls it in his Crosslincs publication, in which he tells us all about swish dining with notables every day of a week but one, which was a strange title because it is the equivalent of starting out with 5000 loaves and fishes and ending up with just a few being eaten amongst a select handful.

Father Ron Smith
Father Ron Smith
10 years ago

One would like to think that Dave Walker’s brilliant cartoons, on the subject of the lack of Bishops voting in the house of Lords at the time of the passing of Lord Alli’s amendment – allowing same-sex civil partnerships to be solemnised in a religious ceremony – were merely a clever representation of satire. One wonders whether this tacit message from the Church of England’s Bishops – that the spiritual support of LGBTs was beneath their dignity to provide – was actually intentional – or out of embarrassment? Will those same absent Bishops draw back from implementing the recommendations of… Read more »

Richard Ashby
Richard Ashby
10 years ago

No doubt the original intention, supposing that they act as a group and had discussed the issue of what to do, was to attend and vote against. May be, following the furore this past week or so, including the letter and leading article in the Times, they were shamed into absence. Or perhaps they realised that they really had gone too far this time, presuming to dictate to other congregations, not their own. Perhaps having defeated the amendments in the Equality Bill, they decided not to push their luck any further. Burying their heads in the sand seemed like the… Read more »

Perry Butler
Perry Butler
10 years ago

I suppose if a good number had turned up the division within the House of Bishops would have been obvious to all. Also, I imagine “the usual suspects” turning up and voting against would have put them firmly in the firing line for more criticism, not least from the religious bodies themselves….nt good in view of the persecution of Quakers and Unitarians in the past. But it has to be said the bishops have not come out of this at all well and i cant help feeling come proper Lords reform they will be for the heave ho. However I… Read more »

Richard Ashby
Richard Ashby
10 years ago

Today’s Telegraph front page reports that there are fears that churches will now be sued if they refuse to perform civil partnerships in church. The usual suspects are again saying how this will undermine marriage. No one has yet explained to me how this will happen. Does any one else know?

Erika Baker
Erika Baker
10 years ago

Richard
It’s obvious! Gay couples will now turn en masse to hostile priests because we are so determined to ruin our own ceremonies just to sock it to the church. And if we find one who wants to stand his ground we immediately take him to court. After we’ve won we will force the same priest to officiate to just show him that we have the power. Who knows, we might even sue again if he doesn’t smile in the photos.

It will undermine marriage because… give me 10 minutes and I’ll think of something…

Richard Ashby
Richard Ashby
10 years ago

Sorry Erika, time’s up. Some years ago, after the Civil partnership legislation was passed I wrote to the Church Times (in the days when I subscribed to it, no longer I might add) asking the same question. How do civil partnerships undermine marriage? I wrote that I was waiting for the flood of reports of jilted brides and bridegrooms left wailing at the altar, and reports of men and women who fled the marriage bed for the delights of seriously disordered same sex relationships. I am still waiting. The response to the letter, apart from a couple of supportive personal… Read more »

Perry Butler
Perry Butler
10 years ago

Indeed it is a myth! How something that will probably be undertaken by 1-2% of the population undermine hetero-sexual marriage is a mystery to me. Isnt it more likely to be adultery, serial monogamy, co-habitation etc etc on the part of the hetero-sexual majority.I think the bishops ought to be more concerned that fewer and fewer people are getting married, more and more children are born outside marriage and church weddings are drying up. But we hear remarkably little about this. I think its a sort of psychological “displacement”.the bishops have been simply unable to DO anything about these hetero-sexual… Read more »

Father Ron Smith
Father Ron Smith
10 years ago

“How do bishops deal with their cohabiting children I have always wondered. Or indeed what happens when a gay son or daughter brings a same sex partner home?” – Perry Butler – Well, Perry, some of them manage to ‘turn the other cheek’; while others, no doubt, deliver heated homilies before surrendering their errant children to the misery/delights of anathema – in my own experience, not many!) The same used to with those children who once erred with their heterosexual relationships – even, sometimes, scorning the safety-net of a Church Wedding. However, nowadays, their parents -sometimes members of the clergy… Read more »

Barry A. orford
Barry A. orford
10 years ago

I remember Richard Ashby’s letter questioning how same-sex partnerships actually undermine marriage, because it asked the question I would have asked. What distresses me in the present situation is that not only are same-sex couples meant to obey rules which are applied to no other members of the C of E (heterosexuals would riot if asked to submit to them), but also that those promoting anti-gay measures seem unaware or (far worse) uncaring at the cruelty they are advocating.

11
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x