Thinking Anglicans

Attacks on government plans to change the definition of marriage

The Church Times reports today on the campaign organised under the title Coalition for Marriage: Petition against gay marriage attracts thousands of names.

THE Government came under sus­tained attack this week from a coalition of Christian groups and in­dividuals over its plans to legalise same-sex marriage.

The coalition’s petition attracted about 23,000 signatures within 48 hours of its launch, including those of the Bishops of Carlisle, Chester, Exeter, and Hereford.

The Coalition for Marriage, estab­lished by the Christian Institute, with signatories from senior officials of Care, the Evangelical Alliance, Chris­tian Concern, and other organ­isations, accuses the Government of rewriting the legal definition of marriage without widespread public support for the change…

John Bingham at the Telegraph reported earlier in the week: Gay marriage: David Cameron faces church backlash over ‘cultural vandalism’.

Last month the Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, publicly voiced his opposition to same-sex marriage in an interview with The Daily Telegraph.

But the Bishop of Salisbury, the Right Rev Nicholas Holtam, signalled a split within the Church of England on the subject by signalling his support for gay marriage.

Among those who have signed the Coalition For Marriage petition are the Rt Revd Peter Foster, the Bishop of Chester; the Rt Revd Anthony Priddis, Bishop of Hereford; the Rt Revd Michael Langrish, Bishop of Exeter and the Rt Revd James Newcome, Bishop of Carlisle.

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, has yet to set out his position on the issue publicly but a spokesman for the Church of England said yesterday: “The Church will respond in full to the government consultation when it is launched next month, and remains committed to the definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman.

“Meanwhile, we hope people will think deeply about this question, which is more complicated than it is painted.

“While not standing in the way of same-sex couples in civil partnerships gaining equal rights and responsibilities to married heterosexual couples, the Church of England will continue to argue for the definition of marriage, which has supported society for so long, not to be changed.”

And today, the Bishop of Salisbury published this statement on his diocesan website: Marriage and same-sex relationships

Statement re: meeting with Dorset clergy on 14 February concerning the Bishop of Salisbury’s comments on same-sex relationships in The Times and on BBC Radio 4

The Bishop of Sherborne, the Archdeacon of Dorset and I met with 10 clergy from Dorset who had contacted me following my remarks on same-sex relationships in an interview published in The Times on 3 February, and on the BBC Radio 4 Sunday programme on 5 February.

Bishop Graham and I disagree about the appropriateness of using the word ‘marriage’ for same-sex relationships. He expressed his concerns to me privately and in the meeting. We are, however, committed to working together creatively…

Earlier, Bishop Holtam had delivered this presidential address to his diocesan synod. The topics covered include this one, as well as numerous others. But on this point he said:

I am sorry my comments about same sex relationships got such elevated treatment by The Times, when reporting a small part of a wider interview. I hope I got the tone and content clearer in the subsequent interview for BBC Radio 4’s Sunday Programme. When Civil Partnerships were introduced in 2005, I thought their distinction from heterosexual marriage was helpful. They are an important support to faithful love, and faithful love is a distinctive mark of Christianity because it reflects God’s love of us.

Because the quality and nature of some Civil Partnerships is similar, possibly the same as for married couples, I have come to see that the rapidly adopted name “gay marriage” may be appropriate. As we know, the Government begins its consultation about this next month and that they have already explicitly exempted religious communities from being forced to accept the conduct of homosexual marriage in addition to heterosexual marriage.

In saying what I did, I am trying to create the space for an honest conversation. We have no option but to recognise our context is changing and that we are talking about people, some of whom are within the life of the Church; that we are talking about ‘us’, not ‘them’.

For the avoidance of doubt, the position of the Church of England, House of Bishops and Diocese of Salisbury has not changed. There are no authorised services of blessing for same sex partnerships and it is not possible for Civil Partnerships to take place in Church of England churches. I will, of course, keep to the Church’s discipline whilst hoping that we find opportunity to explore the issues which divide us.

34
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
34 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
22 Comment authors
vivianGeoffDavid ShepherdMarkBrunsonFather Ron Smith Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Laurence Roberts
Guest
Laurence Roberts

I see they have already started to brow-beat and bully Nick Holtam.

~The idea of course is to silence and subvert him.

This was done to Rowan Williams with famous effectiveness and Jeffrey John in due course.

I just hope Nick can hold out, and that he will receive much support in private, and crucially in public.

JCF
Guest
JCF

Woo-hoo, 23,000 signatures! {sarcasm/Off}

As the CofE races towards irrelevancy, this Anglican (Episcopalian) from across the Pond can only look at how Mother Church has fallen, with great sadness… 🙁

karen macqueen+
Guest

In what sense is the Church of England really the Church of the people of England when it stands against the large majority of the people on an issue that most people in England regard as a matter of equality and justice? In what sense is the Church of England keeping faith with its charism and vocation of comprehensiveness when it excludes LGBTI persons from Sacraments of the Church based on their identity as persons? How far out of step from the sensus fidelium can the bishops be before they are no longer foci of unity? How long will the… Read more »

dr.primrose
Guest
dr.primrose

Separate but equal is inherently unequal. Four years ago, the California Supreme Court found that “equal” rights but separate names for opposite sex couples (“marriages”) and same-sex couples (“domestic partnership,” “civil partnership,” or “civil union”) creates inherent inequality: “[A]ffording same-sex couples access only to the separate institution of domestic partnership, and denying such couples access to the established institution of marriage, properly must be viewed as impinging upon the right of those couples to have their family relationship accorded respect and dignity equal to that accorded the family relationship of opposite-sex couples. “First, because of the long and celebrated history… Read more »

David Shepherd
Guest

‘Woo-hoo, 23,000 signatures’

‘…and in other news, the Changing Attitude petition has attracted a whopping 1,429 signatures to date signalling a seismic shift in support for gay marriage!’

The tide has turned! ‘O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!” He chortled in his joy.’

Considering such an impoverished Changing Attitudes petition response, it’s no wonder that some liberal commenters here resort to the notion that numerical support for their position is irrelevant. In which case, why launch a petition at all?

PMD
Guest
PMD

> As the CofE races towards irrelevancy

Remind me, how many members has the “relevant” ECUSA gained in the last decade?

Father David
Guest
Father David

Sarum – Anti Covenant
Sherborne – Pro Covenant

Sarum – Pro Same Sex “marriage”
Sherborne – Anti Same Sex “marriage”

It doesn’t seem to be a very harmonious episcopal “honeymoon” down in the diocese of Salisbury!

As Isaac Newton once so wisely proclaimed:- “To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction”

He could have been describing the Church of England.

Bene
Guest
Bene

Bishop Nick Holtam’s is the courageous voice that the church has missed for far too long.
Email your support to him – it is the positive news that lifts the spirits.
And pray that there are other people willing to step up to the line, who are neither too lethargic, or fearful.
But in the end it must be vox populi which supports the honest common sense of +Nick. Let those voices be heard, too!

Father Ron Smith
Guest

Bishop Nicholas Holtam certainly shows intestinal fortitude in standing against the current ethos of gender/sexuality hypocrisy in the Church of England. Perhap those bishops and others whop want to keep these things ‘in the dark’ might take courage from + Salisbury’s desire for the Church to become open and accountable in matters requiring justice and truth in the Church. For General Synod having agreed to provide Church pensions for surviving same-sex partners of a deceased glergy-person – without really accepting the status of living same-sex relationships of both clergy and lay persons in the Church, must surely be accounted hypocritical.… Read more »

Richard Ashby
Guest
Richard Ashby

Very pleased that the Government has hit back robustly against the mean spirited and nasty.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/9104785/Lynne-Featherstone-tells-Church-dont-polarise-gay-marriage-debate.html

dr.primrose
Guest
dr.primrose

My post from last night didn’t appear. Could you check if it went to spam? Thanks.

I did, and it did, and I have now published it.

Apologies.

John
Guest
John

I think four things: (1) It is thoroughly laudable that two bishops have said what they have said. (2) The response to the Changing Attitude petition is indeed disappointing. (3) It is sad that Father David now seems to feel the need repeatedly to take pot-shots at the C of E. That way, if constantly taken, leads to a door marked ‘Exit’, which I should be sorry to see him going through (and which I don’t actually think he wants to go through). (4) If the government (which I generally dislike) sticks with its ‘gay marriage’ policy (and I think… Read more »

Simon Sarmiento
Guest

Just to clarify, John is I assume referring to this piece by Theo Hobson which is linked in today’s opinion roundup.

http://www.spectator.co.uk/faithbased/7672918/the-defence-of-christianity-needs-a-little-more-nuance.thtml

I agree wholeheartedly with John’s comment that
“our church leaders are playing a very unwise game”
and I see no sign whatever that they have the slightest idea of this.

Father David
Guest
Father David

John, I don’t think the issue is that of me repeatedly taking “pot-shots at the CofE” but rather, alas, the CofE constantly and consistently shooting itself in the foot.

Craig Nelson
Guest
Craig Nelson

It ought to be pointed out that it is not the definition of marriage that is changing, merely making the institution available to couples of the same sex. Heterosexual marriages (both existing and future) will be unaffected in any way, shape or form and currently married same sex couples including in the EU, US and Commonwealth will continue to be married on their visits to the UK, unlike at present.

JCF
Guest
JCF

I’m sorry my sincere lamentation seems to have struck a nerve. As far as small numbers for (respectively) Changing Attitude and TEC, that’s sort of the point: we are *collateral damage* of homophobes driving the Church ***as a whole*** into irrelevancy. Do I wish that secularizing society at large could DISTINGUISH between homophobic Christianists and LGBT-affirming Christians, abandoning (w/ contempt!) only the former? Yes. But they see oppression coming under the banner of “Christ”, by those calling themselves “Christians”. If they lump all of us together, it’s perfectly understandable. The point isn’t 23K signatures on one “Christian” petitition, versus 1,429… Read more »

john
Guest
john

Father David,

Thanks.

I might even agree with you about ‘the CofE constantly and consistently shooting itself in the foot’, though unfortunately our grounds for that judgement would be pretty well opposed. I just think that one can remain loyal to the body, if not exactly the institution, and fight for some sort of harmony between its different parts. You presumably think that this is more difficult for you as a traditionalist. Depends on the area, I think. One can get onself into a cast of mind where everything seems wrong, and I don’t think it is – for anybody.

Counterlight
Guest

I think the Church of Mammon leaves all the other churches behind in the dust when it comes to both membership and true allegiance. Everyone’s jumping on that bandwagon, including Christian hierarchs. In fact, whole churches are signing up. “Nearer to God are the prayers of the affluent.”

Let’s open our hymnals now to hymn 24, “Pay to Play.”

Watch those camels march through the eye of that needle.

William
Guest
William

“Do I wish that secularizing society at large could DISTINGUISH between homophobic Christianists and LGBT-affirming Christians, abandoning (w/ contempt!) only the former? Yes.”

I’ve had conversations with many secularists and atheists, always arguing from an orthodox perspective. This is the only debate they are interested in having – you may well convince them that you are a certain type of liberal Christian but I suspect this type of Christianity will be of little interest to them.

Father Ron Smith
Guest

Why, I sometimes wonder, does one find an ethos of encouragement and thanksgiving and acceptance of the Joy of Salvation in the worship atmosphere of a ‘liberal’ Church; while all too often conservative churches seem hell-bent on the consequences of sin?

Some how, the Joy of the Good News of Jesus Christ seems to be muted in the self-righteous. They seemingly have salvation, but don’t celebrate it.

Laurence Roberts
Guest
Laurence Roberts

Start The Week this morning on radio 4 with Andrew Marr was marvellous ! Karen Armstrong, David Holloway and two excellent authors.

Repeated this evening ! Enjoy this encouraging exploration of faith.

Even Fr Kelly and SCM feature, a C16th Spanish nun playwright, and the Haggadah feature and more.

Nigel LLoyd
Guest
Nigel LLoyd

Start the Week brilliant – but the Holloway in question was Richard. David Holloway is someone very different!

Laurence Roberts
Guest
Laurence Roberts

Thanks Nigel what on earth was I thinking of ! It was indeed Richard, him formerly of SSM, Edinburgh and primus of Scotland; and still bringing Jesus (hope I got that name right !) at age 78 whether they like it or not !

I hope everyone has read or will read his Dobts and Loves where he nails the Lambeth of 1:10 infamy– and manages to present the love of forgiveness…

Father Ron Smith
Guest

“Four years ago, the California Supreme Court found that “equal” rights but separate names for opposite sex couples (“marriages”) and same-sex couples (“domestic partnership,” “civil partnership,” or “civil union”) creates inherent inequality:” This statement from dr.primrose (above) is seminal in the argument around the title given to a same-sex monogamous faithful partnership. The pity is that the Church, seemingly, would set such a partnership as second-rate – compared to the same relationship between a same-sex couple. The State of California may be more realistic in its assessment of the two types of monogamous relationships as being morally equal in value… Read more »

MarkBrunson
Guest

Why should Jesus bother to come back to a world filled with such hate. Every time I go off to be with friends and family, and God on my days off, I feel great and soaring hopes for humanity. I come back, see the remarks about gays and lesbians, about women, about liberals, see comment from such “christian” leaders as York and Williams, from supposed “brothers and sisters” here . . . and some part of me dies. Just dies. I’m about 90% of the way to being able to say, “I believe in God and Jesus . . .… Read more »

american piskie
Guest
american piskie

“and primus of Scotland”

Or maybe not.

Primus (inter pares) of the Bishops of the Scottish Episcopal Church, a rather small (though of course perfectly formed) dissenting body in whose dioceses the English Bishops have been known in the past to establish “proper” churches staffed by men holding “correct” political views.

How history doth repeat herself. Standing on her head.

Mary Marriott
Guest
Mary Marriott

Albert Schweitzer felt similarly to you Mark B so you’re in very good company. Don’t give up.

Your goodness counts too – as did Schweitzer’s

David Shepherd
Guest

‘Now if I help you, it matters that you see, These sordid kinda things are coming hard to me. It’s taken me some time to work out what to do. I weighed the whole thing out before I came to you. I have no thought at all about my own reward. I really didn’t come here of my own accord. Just don’t say I’m … damned for all time. I came because I had to; I’m the one who saw. Jesus can’t control it like he did before. And furthermore I know that Jesus thinks so too. Jesus wouldn’t mind… Read more »

Father Ron Smith
Guest

It is so sad that conservatives are all too prepossessed with the deliverance of damnation – to all who believe differently from them!

“Judge not, that ye be not judged” – Jesus

David Shepherd
Guest

If ‘judge not, that ye be not judged’ refers to the mere ability to highlight moral distinctions (as your first paragraph did), it contradicts He who said elsewhere ‘judge righteous judgement’ (John 7:24).

I’d hope you wouldn’t want to make Christ appear self-contradictory, nor to hypocritically polarise and brand as damnably conservative any view that challenges liberal orthodoxy.

God’s prerogative of clemency doesn’t presume our innocence, but exposes our guilt as judged by scripture. It demands that we ‘flee from the wrath to come’ in order to escape the power that God declares will reap our eternal destruction.

MarkBrunson
Guest

Mary,

Thanks. But I’m not a doctor, don’t play the organ, and am not a good man *at all*.

I keep hearing that December 21 this year is to be the end of the world. My birthday is December 22, and I can, at this point, honestly say, “Best. Birthday present. Ever!”

David Shepherd
Guest

Mea culpa…for another wanton act of grammatical violence: to wit, the split infinitive.

Geoff
Guest

Tut, american piskie, is that any way to talk about your mother? 😉

vivian
Guest
vivian

I am a christian and God ordianed marrage so who is man that should change it