Thinking Anglicans

Church Times: Selling marriage short

The Church Times has ignored its own advice and published a second leader further criticising the CofE marriage report: Selling marriage short.

…By taking its cue from the same-sex-marriage debate, and being drawn into tendentious pronouncements about men and women, the report wastes an opportunity to say something positive about marriage in relation to what would once have been termed “living in sin”. The authors elevate marriage above other forms of relationship without ever defining it: are couples deemed to be married if they have not passed through what the report calls “the regulation of formalities”, for example? It argues that the Church’s permitting marriage after divorce has not materially changed its teaching. Yet the prevalence of divorce has done more damage than any other factor to the concept of marital fidelity. Finally, the lack of attention given to relationships before marriage means that the report fails to address the source of the greatest pressure on young people: the severance of sex and commitment.

It is generally unfair to criticise a work for not being something else. We have not dwelt on the sins of commission – the obscure language, the unsupported pronouncements – but in this instance, the sins of omission have created the greatest disappointment. Marriage is a precious element in our society, and it needs a more robust defence.

There is also an excellent article by Jane Shaw titled Men, women, and difference which discusses the complementarity of the sexes as a a comparatively new invention. Sadly this is subscriber-only but for those who can read it the link is here.

2
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
FD BlanchardMartin Reynolds Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Martin Reynolds
Guest
Martin Reynolds

On previous threads we have seen Oliver O’Donovan identified as the author of this report, once by cseitz and also by Graham Kings, both told us what a great piece of scholarship it was …….. Perhaps this faux pas will have positive consequences. The other members of the Commission will have considerable difficulty owning this work and might now feel an urgent need to contribute to the debate. It would be ironic if this discussion paper actually did initiate the very debate we have been eagerly hoping for! If one of the reasons for this paper’s early publication was to… Read more »

FD Blanchard
Guest
FD Blanchard

There is another side to high rates of divorce, a corresponding drop in rates of domestic violence.

http://womenslawreports.blogspot.com/2010/06/no-fault-divorce-and-domestic-violence.html