Thinking Anglicans

EHRC statements on cinema advertisement ban

The Equalities and Human Rights Commission issued the following statement on 11 December:

Statement on Freedom of Expression and the Lord’s Prayer

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has today announced that the issues raised by Digital Cinema Media’s (DCM) decision not to show a Church of England advert about the Lord’s Prayer in cinemas, will be examined as part of a major Commission report.

This report, examining the adequacy of the law protecting freedom of religion or belief, will be published early next year. The DCM decision has generated significant public concern about freedom of speech.

The Commission, the national expert in equality and human rights law, has also offered its legal expertise for the purpose of intervening in the case should the Church take legal proceedings against DCM.

The Commission has written to DCM to highlight the importance of Britain’s long tradition of freedom of expression and to reiterate its concerns about the justification for not showing the advertisement being that it risked offending audiences. There is no right in Britain not to be offended, and respect for people’s right to express beliefs with which others might disagree is the mark of a democratic society.

Chief Executive of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, Rebecca Hilsenrath, said:

“We strongly disagree with the decision not to show the adverts on the grounds they might ‘offend’ people.
“There is no right not to be offended in the UK; what is offensive is very subjective and this is a slippery slope towards increasing censorship.”
“We also understand why people were confused that a commercial Christmas can be advertised but the central Christian prayer cannot. We will therefore examine the issues raised by this case as part of our major review into the law protecting freedom of religion or belief, and publish our findings in the new year.”

Earlier, on 23 November, the Commission had issued this statement: Commission comments on Christian advert being banned from cinemas

Commenting in response to a Christian advert being banned from being shown in the cinema, a Commission spokesperson, said:

“Freedom to hold a religion and freedom to express ideas are essential British values. We are concerned by any blanket ban on adverts by all religious groups.
“Digital Cinema Media have said an advert could cause offence to those of differing faiths or without belief. There is no right not to be offended in the UK; what is offensive is very subjective and lies in the eye of the beholder.
“This does not mean groups or individuals are free to express themselves without restriction. Freedom of expression can be and is restricted but only in order to prevent violence, abuse or discrimination for example. There is nothing in law that prevents Christian organisations promoting their faith through adverts.”

10
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
10 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
9 Comment authors
MarkBrunsonInterested ObserverJames ByronJohn BartonSusannah Clark Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
James Byron
Guest
James Byron

What nonsense from people who should know better.

Cinema chains are private businesses, to which free speech protections don’t apply. Churches have no more right to dictate what theaters show than theaters have the right to dictate the content of sermons. (Though it’d likely be an improvement if they did!)

Craig Nelson
Guest
Craig Nelson

I think the ECHR have really lost the plot here. I think they are now saying that cinemas and others are obliged to take anything and cannot give thought as to whether people will be offended or not on grounds of freedom of expression. OK. Can we now start counting down from 10 until all manner of stuff now has to be beamed onto cinema goers in the name of being offended to prove we have freedom of speech – Satanists, atheists, pro and anti abortion and all manner of unusual religious groups will surely avail themselves of their right… Read more »

Rod Gillis
Guest
Rod Gillis

@ James Byron. Agreed. Freedom of speech is not honored when governments, or bureaucrats, or established religion can tell a media outlet what they must carry. The church is a bit of party crasher on this one, no? Can’t get a crowd at evensong, so let’s muscle in on the Star Wars crowd and harangue them.

Jeremy
Guest
Jeremy

If government is about to determine what adverts cinema chains must accept, let’s abandon all pretense and let government dictate which movies may be shown as well.

David Keen
Guest
David Keen

“Cinema chains are private businesses, to which free speech protections don’t apply”

Not sure why being a private business has much to do with whether the law applies to you or not. It didn’t work as a defence for the ‘gay cake’ bakery.

And there are much better reasons (as this thread already shows) for cinemas not to allow religious advertising. I think it’s good for free speech for the ‘someone might be offended’ excuse for banning religious content to be given a decent burial.

Susannah Clark
Guest

In total agreement with James Byron. This is a nonsense. A private business can show what the hell it wants in its own chain of cinemas, to please and satisfy its customers as it sees fit.

The equivalent would be to insist that Satanists should be allowed to have a slot in church services to promote their beliefs, ‘because they have a right to offend’.

Not that I am having a go at Satanists.

John Barton
Guest
John Barton

James Byron does not seem to realise that the cinemas first accepted the Lord’s Prayer video and even offered to show it at a discount. Their censorship was an afterthought.

It will be interesting to see what advertisements will now be run alongside Star Wars, and what values they promote.

James Byron
Guest
James Byron

David: free speech protections in particular don’t apply to theaters, since free speech is protection from government coercion, and no business, not even Trump Tower, has its own dungeon.

John, if the cinema chains caused the Chruch of England to lose money by making then withdrawing an offer, the church may be able to sue for breach of contract, or something similar. Free speech is simply irrelevant.

Interested Observer
Guest
Interested Observer

“There is no right not to be offended in the UK” There is in the advert reel shown before a U, PG or 12A film, because small children are legally entitled to be there and the adverts must be compatible with the certificate of the main feature. For 12A films then usually the front matter is certificated at U. It’s unusual for adverts and trailers to be certificated at PG or 12A, because those (in theory at least) rely on parents reading the certification material; you don’t get that choice before being shown adverts or trailers. So any advert of… Read more »

MarkBrunson
Guest
MarkBrunson

Yes. Please, whine and get offended. That’ll show ’em how the Christian faith is different and able to weather insults.

I mean, really! In the face of something this egregious, this horribly anti-Christian, what are persecutions in the Middle East, or even beheading, crucifixion, or being burned to death on a metal grid? You had your advertisement pulled! And in the Christmas season, clearly indicating how Christianity has been allowed no place at all in the public forum!