Thinking Anglicans

Agenda for July 2016 General Synod – press reports

Harry Farley Christian Today Church of England split over gay marriage may be unavoidable, admits Welby’s chief of staff

Madeleine Davies and Hattie Williams Church Times Talk nicely or else, Synod members are counselled ahead of sex talks

[The Timetable for the Shared Conversations and the Grace and Dialogue Booklet are available online.]

Update

John Bingham The Telegraph The ‘sincere’ schism: Church of England’s etiquette guide for gay marriage rows

8
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
8 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
CynthiaJames ByronKateErika BakerHelen King Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Helen King
Guest
Helen King

As someone who took part in the regional version, I’m interested finally to see the GS version. The booklet’s use of ‘taking out the pews’ as an example makes the point that people take up the same position for very different reasons, and presumably the authors are trying to keep this as unthreatening as possible (they even avoid the usual emotive language of ‘ripping out the pews’! I like the emotional intelligence advice in the fifth section. But I still don’t have a sense of what GS members will actually be doing. Does everything happen in the group of 20… Read more »

Father David
Guest
Father David

So, after all this Talk-Talk – will any proposals be tabled and voted upon or will there simply be a statement issued after all the secret conversations saying – “Let’s all be terribly nice to one another”?

Helen King
Guest
Helen King

Fr David, I don’t think anyone expects a statement at this stage, but it’s my understanding that some attempt at a motion is expected in 2017.

Erika Baker
Guest
Erika Baker

Fr David, I agree with Helen here. There has been a lot of TalkTalk, not in General Synod, and it’s GS where any actual decisions will be made. As a participant in one of the Shared Conversations I think this a hugely positive start. They’re not “secret”, but they’re “confidential”. We’ve clearly not been successful with our conversations so far. We keep getting stuck at the same place. I see a lot of people supporting the traditional view who caricature the liberal approach and then dismiss it – and vice versa. We tend to talk at each other, not with… Read more »

Kate
Guest
Kate

“They are not a facilitated theological debate, they are a facilitated experience of each other as real people.”

Apart from the fact that if people “out” themselves to offer personal experience they risk being treated like Jeremy Pemberton et al.

Cynthia
Guest
Cynthia

Re shared conversations: I don’t really care why the conservatives believe in their exclusive version of the Kingdom of Heaven; it isn’t going to influence my experience of God’s Love and my learned reading. I’ve stopped caring about how some conservatives continue to say that the inclusive view is “culture” rather than a powerful revelation of the life and teachings of Jesus, and how the same people can’t see that they are equally guilty of cherry picking Scripture. What matters is why one group is empowered to oppress the other and when does this onerous oppression end? Those are the… Read more »

James Byron
Guest
James Byron

I know why conservatives believe as they do: many are decent people who sincerely believe that the Bible ties their hands; others are homophobic, and using scripture for cover. The solution is clear: conservatives must be willing to stop demanding their personal beliefs be imposed on everyone else, and to share a church with those who disagree. If “shared conversations” don’t allow for debate and deals on policy, how do they aid in that necessary change? Right now, it looks like they’re yet another delaying tactic by the bishops. This doesn’t impugn those using them to better understand and empathize… Read more »

Cynthia
Guest
Cynthia

Re: Talk Nice…

Tone policing is “a thing.” It’s used to minimize the real anguish of hurting people for the comfort of others. It is crucial for CoE to hear the anguish. There’s a weird cultural belief that all can be resolved with abstraction reason and that all views are equally valid. It can’t and they aren’t.

The anguish needs voice, the truth of the fruits of exclusionary rhetoric need to be heard, and the conservatives need to answer for whether to continue to impose this suffering or to open their hearts and leave judgement to God instead of themselves.