Thinking Anglicans

A binding covenant?

The Times claims a scoop today on what the Windsor Report will say. Acccording to Ruth Gledhill:

A commission set up to save the Church from schism will propose a binding covenant.

Anglican provinces are to be told they must sign an unbreakable unity agreement which would prevent dioceses and provinces from ordaining bishops such as Gene Robinson in the US again. A “star chamber” will adjudicate when provinces are accused of breaking the agreement.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ruidh
17 years ago

Does “star chamber” have the same, universally negative connotations in the UK that it has in the US?

Since one oft-heard conservative complaint is that liberals say the words to the creeds but don’t believe them, how will this accomplish anything? I suppose it depends on the content of the agreement, but the one I saw was pretty vague.

J. C. Fisher
17 years ago

I don’t know about the US connotations of “star chamber,” but I think that this (“Anglican provinces are to be told they must sign an unbreakable unity agreement”) will remind more than a few Yanks of a (Joseph) McCarthy-esque “loyalty oath.” (Or a Tudor-era oath of allegiance, for that matter: I pray we Episcopalians don’t lose our heads for refusing to sign!) I still say that ECUSA should just declare that–no matter what–we *are in communion* w/ the AC, and let the chips fall where they may. At any Anglican altar (anywhere), expatriate Episcopalians should answer _Christ’s_ invitation to “take… Read more »

Ruidh
17 years ago

“Star chamber” has pretty uniformly negative connotations in the US: secret trials, lack of due process, inability to confront witnesses, inavailability of appeal — pretty much what we’ve been doing to the detainees in Guantanamo.

We’ll see the report in a few hours and we’ll see if “star chamber” is Ms. Gledhill’s own term or not.

4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x