Church of England measures passed by the General Synod have to be passed by both Houses of Parliament before they can receive Royal Assent. Before this they are reviewed by the Ecclesiastical Committee of Parliament. The Church Times has reported that two draft measures have not been well received by the committee.
Ecclesiastical Committee concerned about power dynamics in National Church Governance Measure
Concerns about the “huge power” enjoyed by the body set to replace the Archbishops’ Council were voiced in Parliament last week, during a meeting of the Ecclesiastical Committee.
Convened to consider the National Church Governance Measure, which is set to overhaul the National Church Institutions (NCIs), the Committee heard lengthy criticism by Danny Kruger, the MP for East Wiltshire who defected from the Conservatives to Reform last month. His concerns were focused on Church of England National Services (CENS), a new charity replacing the Archbishops’ Council, that will be responsible for distributing funds allocated by the Church Commissioners…
There is an uncorrected transcript of the Committee’s public meeting at which it took evidence from Church representatives here.
Clergy conduct batted back to General Synod
The Ecclesiastical Committee of Parliament is expected to send the draft Clergy Conduct Measure (CCM) back to the General Synod for further consideration rather than approve its passage into law.
On Wednesday, the Church Times understood that the Measure had been rejected as “not expedient”, on the basis, primarily, of concerns about the default expectation in the CCM that tribunal hearings would be held in private.
The publication of a report confirming the parliamentary decision and setting out the reasons behind it is expected to be published next week…
The report has not yet been published; when it is it will be published here.
I was on the steering committee for the National Governance Measure, and I think the points made in Parliament were mainly rehearsed in detail on our deliberations (we didn’t address the point on how Crown appointments are made …). What is clear to me, in relation to the “huge power” issue is that the arrangements proposed do not increase the power at the centre, and in fact bring it closer to Synodical scrutiny whilst respecting the role of the charity trustees. Arrangements for scrutiny beyond questions in Synod are in the legislation, and the financial framework is brought to Synod… Read more »