Thinking Anglicans

Smyth Review update

News from the Church of England

Smyth Review update

Following an update in January about timings on the Smyth Review the National Safeguarding Team, NST, has now provided a further update to the survivors and victims, who suffered the appalling abuse by the late John Smyth.

The reviewers are still continuing to receive important information, with some completely new people coming forward to make representations, including victims and people who knew Smyth over the years. There was an evidence deadline of September 2021, however it was considered important that these voices were heard to obtain a fuller picture as possible.

The approach the reviewers are taking to draft the report is to cover all the material in a largely chronological way, providing drafts covering the different periods and starting the representations process with those people named in the report as it progresses. This phased approach is considered more effective and helpful for all those involved, particularly survivors and victims, rather than presenting the full report to the NST all in one go. The first phase draft is expected to be with the NST within a month and it will continue to receive drafts over the summer months.

The Church (as stated by the Archbishop of Canterbury) is committed to full and unredacted publication of the report. The representations process, for all involved is expected to be complex, with the eventual date of publication being determined by this.

There will be further updates when more precise timings are known. Both the reviewers and the Church recognise that this review has the potential to be re-traumatising for victims and survivors and support continues to be offered, please contact in the first instance.

Notify of

1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Interested Observer
Interested Observer
1 year ago

The main unifying characteristic in both the Grenfell and the Post Office Horizon inquiries is to kick the can as far down the road as possible, to give ample time for everyone who might actually have been involved to forget, destroy evidence, retire or die. It would appear the Smyth review is aiming for the same outcome.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x