Thinking Anglicans

opinion

Michael Sadgrove Extraverts and Introverts: a plea for understanding

David Keen Vicars – A Great Resource Squandered?

Brother Ivo Defending Lord Hope -different times, different understandings

Kelvin Holdsworth Beware of the Celibate

Giles Fraser The Guardian Superstition can’t be exorcised just by simply turning off the God switch

18
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
18 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
11 Comment authors
Martin ReynoldsRod GillisSteve LuskChristina BeardsleyMarkBrunson Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Rod Gillis
Guest
Rod Gillis

Michael Sadgrove refers the Myers-Briggs test in his article. The test is considered gospel in some pastoral care circles. One hears folks in church circles saying things like “I’m a ‘j’ “. One wonders how many folks have been self-stereotyped by this hokey test.

JCF
Guest
JCF

I’d rather be “self-stereotyped” than other-stereotyped (“finds meaning in the ‘hokey'”).

Rod Gillis
Guest
Rod Gillis

Re JFC, Sure parlor games can be fun; but the problem with self-stereotyping is that it can hinder the maturation of native ability and the acquisition of new skills. A person may come to believe they can’t develop in a certain direction because it runs counter to self perception. Myers-Briggs has been used for decades as a requirement for entry into Clinical Pastoral Education. Once in, the training may reinforce Myers-Briggs outcomes i.e. add to the hokum. Saying ” I’m a ‘J’ “, for example, is much like saying “I’m a Capricorn”. The validity of the test is widely contested.… Read more »

Cynthia
Guest
Cynthia

Well Rod, the M-B has been used for a long time. I usually hear that it runs along a spectrum and that you can change over time, as one grows. I guess that if someone was using it as a totally fixed entity, it might be stereotyping and boxing people in, but if it’s a snapshot of where one is at a particular time, it sounds useful to me. I thought the Enneagram was hokum, but I’m starting to have a real appreciation for it. But there aren’t just the 9 types. There are a lot of nuances and built… Read more »

Rod Gillis
Guest
Rod Gillis

@ Cynthia, I realize the MB has been around a long time, but longevity makes iconoclasm even more fun. We all have things that appeal to one’s sense of uniqueness or vanity. ( : My dear departed granny used to light novena candles to St. Anthony and read people’s “fortunes” with a deck of 52. I find it interesting that this test enjoys so much, almost superstitious like, currency in religious circles. Like fortune telling and a personal bond with a saint, it tends to mythologize rather than analyze personality. Here’s a link to a critical and somewhat humorous view… Read more »

Dennis
Guest
Dennis

The Meyers Briggs is a junk psychological test. It wasn’t created through the accepted methods of item selection and norming that lies behind a reputable psychological exam. The gold standard is the MMPI-II but there are others. In the US the administration and interpretation of psychological tests is mostly restricted to doctoral-level clinical psychologists. Because of ethical codes requiring that only well established tests be used by clinical psychologists, you would have a hard time finding a psychologist here who uses the MBTI. There are masters level counselors who use it because the publishers will sell it to almost anyone.… Read more »

JCF
Guest
JCF

“A person may come to believe they can’t develop in a certain direction because it runs counter to self perception.” As Cynthia says, *anything* can be misused. And one could only derive the above ^ if one were misusing MBTI. But please, enlighten us to a pluriform description of personality that’s better (serious invitation). “Saying ” I’m a ‘J’ “, for example, is much like saying “I’m a Capricorn”.” To be perfectly frank, I’m both (though I would NEVER put it that way!). But then again, there’s a lot of “both” in Myers-Briggs. It’s not direction-limiting fortune-telling, it’s a TOOL.… Read more »

Interested Observer
Guest
Interested Observer

“Well Rod, the M-B has been used for a long time.”

So have tarot cards and horoscopes. If anything, they are more effective, as if done face-to-face both are (at root) cold reading.

Interested Observer
Guest
Interested Observer

For those googling Dennis’s references, it’s the Forer effect, not the Foer effect. There was a more impressive demonstration done in the 1970s of the same effect, by a French group working on horoscopes. They offered to send people a very detailed horoscope, based on the most precise knowledge of the time and place of their birth, in exchange for people filling in a questionnaire about its accuracy (indeed, their “experience of its helpfulness.”). What they actually sent out was the same horoscope to each person, and just for fun, the horoscope was taken from the time and place of… Read more »

Rod Gillis
Guest
Rod Gillis

@ Dennis “I would hope that churches would stop using it [Meyers-Briggs]”. Me too. However this is church land where evidence based decision making is a hard sell. And any kind of inter-disciplinary consultation? Forget about it.

Andrew F. Pierce
Guest

The MBTI doesn’t have many friends here. Once you’ve used the instrument a few times you can easily learn to bend it wherever you will. That, however, doesn’t mean it’s not useful. If you’re using it for the first time it is enlightening. If you’re a pro at manipulating it, it’s still useful because you know what you want it to say and what it would say if you’d simply answered according to ‘natural’ type. As a ‘consultant’ who has used it in the past I find even if the whole group are ‘pros’ they still take it and can… Read more »

Dennis
Guest
Dennis

Yes, sorry, I typed my comment on my phone screen and missed my mistake. It is the “Forer” effect and not the “Foer” effect.

Father Ron Smith
Guest

MBTI should not be used as a tool for manipulation. Used as an ‘Indicator’ of personality traits, which was its intention, can be very enlightening. My wife found out why I tend to do the washing up right away, while she leaves it until there is a pile!

Seriously; it can alert its advocates to definite behavioral trends. For that reason alone, it can be extremely helpful.

MarkBrunson
Guest

Nothing is true.

Everything is true.

I’m right.

No, you’re wrong.

No wonder the Kingdom hangs around, waiting.

Christina Beardsley
Guest
Christina Beardsley

Wasn’t it Fr Kenneth Leech who called the MBTI ‘horoscopes for the middle classes’? Much as I admire Fr Kenneth I have found the MBTI incredibly useful, particularly the Jungian concepts of the shadow and the second half of life. Indeed it presupposes that one will develop one’s shadow potential and functions as life goes on. It has proved an invaluable tool for understanding and appreciating different personalities in team settings I have worked in and the application to spirituality – that different personality types will have different needs and should follow different spiritual paths, or try out paths that… Read more »

Steve Lusk
Guest
Steve Lusk

I’ve always found MBTI to be every bit as useful as astrology in understanding people. But then, being both an INTJ and a Leo, I can’t help being really skeptical.

“The antiquity and general acceptance of an opinion is not assurance of its truth” (Pierre Bayle, 1647-1706)

Rod Gillis
Guest
Rod Gillis

Re Mark Brunson, Not sure if I understand your somewhat enigmatic post correctly, but I would argue that sifting opinions ( this is a thread about opinion) together with evidence in support of the same actually advances the “kingdom”. The kingdom of God, taken from biblical mythology, is simply a metaphor for community and community making. Community is built up by a critical reflection on what may be true, edifying, constructive, real and so forth. The MB “test” together with Jungian concepts like those mentioned by Christina Beardsley enjoy a lot of currency in pastoral education and spiritual direction circles.… Read more »

Martin Reynolds
Guest
Martin Reynolds

When overhearing this mentioned at a conference in the early 70’s I thought it a new version of the four source theory …..