Thinking Anglicans

Update on IICSA hearings – 5 March

Updated Tuesday morning

The transcript of the first day’s proceedings is now available here. It contains opening statements by:

Alexis Jay, Chair of the Inquiry
Fiona Scolding, Counsel to the Inquiry,
Richard Scorer, representing survivors
David Greenwood, also representing survivors, and also MACSAS
Nigel Giffin, representing the Archbishops’ Council
Rory Phillips, representing Ecclesiastical Insurance
Richard Smith representing Peter Ball

The Church of England has issued this: Opening statement in IICSA hearing

Media reports:

Witness statements have been published by IICSA from numerous individuals, all listed by name here and accessible (but only by reference number) over here.

They include written statements from these Archbishops’ Council staff:

William Nye
Stephen Slack
Julian Hubbard
Hannah Foster

In a separate development, the BBC’s Yorkshire regional news programme Inside Out has broadcast an interview with Matthew Ineson who says senior clergymen ignored his disclosures of sexual abuse by a parish priest. Link to the TV programme here, is available for 29 days only.

See also BBC news article, Police look at bishops’ ‘failure to act’ over sex abuse claims.

Other media reports on this:
Archbishop of York could face police investigation for failing to act over abuse allegations
Church of England sex abuse victim to tell his story on TV

10
Leave a Reply

avatar
3000
10 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
5 Comment authors
Mark BennetKatePete BroadbentDavid RuncornAnthony Archer Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
Anthony Archer
Guest
Anthony Archer

The Inquiry, with the benefit of some excellent witness statements about what the Church of England is (including that of William Nye), is already getting its mind around an institution that has considerable dispersed authority, with the inevitable consequence that on occasions there is no authority. “The Church of England as a whole has no legal status or personality” [Lord Hope in Aston Cantlow PCC v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37]. The consequences of this for safeguarding and other critical regulatory and compliance issue are immense. How is the CofE governed? For example, the Nye statement (paragraph 24) discusses diocesan synods.… Read more »

Kate
Guest
Kate

The current trend seems to be to increase episcopal oversight. I think Anthony Archer is correct but it seems unlikely that a transfer of resources and responsibilities towards Synod and diocesan synods would gain support from the present House of Bishops.

David Runcorn
Guest

Kate I do not think that the CofE approach to episcopal oversight has actually changed. Nor is Anthony saying this is he? I share his concern about a power imbalance and prioritising of episcopal authority that has always been there – ‘for too long’. But I would agree that current approaches to strategy and policy are making this much more evident and the impact ‘felt’. And nor, in the end, do I think it actually works.

Kate
Guest
Kate

Anthony said that CofE is episcopally led but synodically governed but highlighted that the synodic governance function isn’t properly resourced. The clear inferences of what he said, for me, are a) that the episcopate is, in practice, undertaking governance which should properly be synodic and b) that of necessity that will require a transfer of resources from episcopal support to support the synods.

Anthony delicately didn’t say it overtly, but I suggest it is hard to read what he wrote and not see those implications.

Pete Broadbent
Guest
Pete Broadbent

A Diocesan Synod is a pretty unwieldy and unrepresentative bunch of virtually self-selecting people. If Bishops are to be held to account (and they must be), it’s not the right body to do so. What we may need is (1) the Diocesan Safeguarding Steering Group to have more teeth and to be able to require a bishop to comply with the duties laid upon them (2) a mechanism for the Trustees of the Diocese (Bishop’s Council) to have greater clout in governance terms (3) an independent scrutiny and appeal body, mandatorily funded (ie you can’t cut its budget) to have… Read more »

Kate
Guest
Kate

I am unsure on the best solution but I do believe that the church should demonstrate both effective safeguarding AND Christian forgiveness. It is hard for the same individuals to do both without at least the appearance of conflict. One of the big challenges of the present imbroglio is that we – particularly at a congregational level – might lose sight of the need to forgive sexual predators because we get so wrapped up in the mechanics of safeguarding. That would be a tragedy. Somehow, we need to be capable of both.

Mark Bennet
Guest
Mark Bennet

Kate – I don’t think it is for congregations to forgive, and we need to be very clear that whatever sense of hurt and betrayal a congregation may feel, it is those who have actually been abused who have been most damaged, and the congregation should not presume to speak for them. It also strikes me that those who have been damaged have also a damaged sense of/capacity for agency, and that it is inappropriate for congregations to put pressure on victims to forgive or even to collude in “forgiveness”. God never gives up on anyone, not even on abusers… Read more »

Mark Bennet
Guest
Mark Bennet

WIth reference to Pete Broadbent’s comments, Diocesan Synods are described in the inquiry evidence as essentially ‘deliberative bodies’ and are, I agree, the wrong body in which to vest any effective supervisory function. But I don’t think the Bishops Council meets the bill either it its current form. The problem of holding office-holders to account is not unique to the church – look at MPs for example. And office-holders in the church have often jealously guarded their “independence” – by which has often been meant independence from scrutiny and accountability. Many of us have been trained and culturally formed in… Read more »

Kate
Guest
Kate

Mark,before we take communion we all pray, as Jesus taught us,

“Forgive us out trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.”

That does not mean only forgiving things we don’t care about, but the really difficult things too. Any suggestion that there should be bounds on the forgiveness is incompatible with communion. And yes, we should be encouraging victims to forgive too because forgiveness is a central aspect of Christian teaching. It might be hard teaching but following Jesus isn’t always easy.

Mark Bennet
Guest
Mark Bennet

Kate: but who has been trespassed against, and whose forgiveness are we asking? It is not the church which stands in the place of the victim.