The motion shown below was passed unanimously by the Faith, Worship and Ministry Committee (a Standing Committee of the Anglican Church of Canada) at its recent meeting. It goes now as a recommendation to the governing body of the Canadian church - the Council of General Synod - that will meet in May to determine Canada’s response to the Primates’ communique.
Motion FWM 03.05.#6
Moved by Patricia Bays
Seconded by Richard Leggett
That, while acknowledging the sincere concern of Anglicans throughout the world for the unity of the Communion and recognizing the pain of Anglicans of all persuasions caused by recent events, this Faith, Worship and Ministry Committee reluctantly but firmly recommends to the Council of General Synod the following resolution:
1. That the Council of General Synod confirm the membership of the Anglican Church of Canada in the Anglican Consultative Council with the expectation that the duly elected members attend and participate in the June 2005 meeting of the Council in the UK.
2. That the Council of General Synod welcome the invitation to explain at the June 2005 meeting of the Anglican Consultative Council the current situation, the steps that were taken by Dioceses of the Anglican Church of Canada and the General Synod and the underlying theological and biblical rationale with respect to the decision to bless committed same sex unions.
3. That the Council of General Synod, in response to the second part of Paragraph 14 of the Primates’ Statement of February 24 2005, commend the Windsor Report to the Anglican Church of Canada for study.
Explanatory Notes
Part 1 of the Motion
Part 2 of the Motion
Part 3 of the Motion
Carried unanimously
Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Tuesday, 15 March 2005 at 10:10pm GMT | TrackBackHow magnificent that Canada has made a thoughtful, cogent and thoroughly correct (canonically) response to the bizarre resolution from the Primates. I don't care where one stands on the *issue* that has prompted this. The important thing is that we have established methods and institutions for dealing with issues, and this Motion affirms that fact. Now, can ECUSA do the same? Please?
Posted by: Jeremy on Tuesday, 15 March 2005 at 11:10pm GMTHow pathetic that the Canadian church is evidently unwilling to even fulfill the most gentle request of primates to allow for breathing space and an eventual defusing of the terrible mess we Anglicans find ourselves in.
And here I thought that Americans were supposed to be the unilateralists...
Posted by: who cares on Tuesday, 15 March 2005 at 11:34pm GMTSo much for "making space and time to resolve our differences". As the majority of the primates views probably reflect the views of the provinces representatives on the ACC, I wonder what they will do to the Canadians and ECUSAns if they try to attend...
Mind you the ACC is, I believe, even more disproportionately liberal dominated than other Anglican structures, so maybe it will be the place of the "last stand" that causes the breakup of the Anglican communion ?!
Posted by: Dave on Tuesday, 15 March 2005 at 11:37pm GMTIt's about time somebody said something intelligent in this debate. Good for Canada.
If the pointy-hats from the "Global South" want to walk, let 'em. I'm utterly bored with this drama, and totally sick of the strutting and posturing of homophobes. Gene Robinson is a Bishop. Gay unions are going to be blessed. It's all according to Hoyle. Deal.
Now let's move on to something more productive.
Posted by: bls on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 at 1:24am GMTCanada to the Primates: Drop Dead.
Posted by: Dave on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 at 5:32am GMTCanada to the Primates: Drop Dead.
Exactly. Three cheers for Canada.
Posted by: bls on Wednesday, 16 March 2005 at 7:39pm GMT"Canada to the Primates: Drop Dead." Posted by Dave at Wednesday, 16 March 2005 at 5:32am GMT
Simon, this may be very pithy, but it wasn't posted by me!! Can someone use another person's identity ? (I notice it has a different email address associated with it).
Anyway, I believe that it was just a committee that has recommended that ACiC Gs make this move... the same committee that recommmended last year that they debate the homosexuality issue, after a survey of church members (that they had polled themselves - presumably to try to get amandate to push ahead)said that they would rather leave the subject alone for the time being!
Posted by: Dave on Thursday, 17 March 2005 at 10:12pm GMTHip Hip Horray/Horrah/Cheers/Felicidades....whatever!
No means NO!
Congratulations ++Canada!
I'm proud of the Canadian church for sticking to principles rather than caving in to pressure groups. One major issue is following procedures -- if a duly constituted body within a province makes a decision, it should stay with that decision, not back off. What Canada as a country has been doing with respect to gay issues is following rules including the Charter of Rights & the voting procedures of the Canadian church. And we are also insisting that other people play by the rules as they exist. Canada is a member of the ACC and has a right to attend and vote. This is not unilateralism; it is fairness and legitimacy standing up against arbitrary acts and petty tyranny.
Posted by: anonymous canadian on Friday, 18 March 2005 at 6:06pm GMTHaving grown up as a Lutheran I am familiar with severely dogmatic stances by different church families. Perhaps this is what attracted me to the Episcopal banner. Many people with vastly different backgrounds and views coming together to worship and love Jesus. Now we have the people who were brought into the fold by missionaries coming back and telling us No. you are all wrong. It is only us who have the true faith. They seem to have no concept that the growth of a church in a region is always, always a reflection of the culture of that region. Pope John Paul seems to have understood that better than our relatively new southern anglican brethren. If they will give us time to arrange our own affairs perhaps they can again learn to arrange their affairs. Certainly with the sexual crisis of AIDS in the African arena they have much more to do than criticize us. Then again it may be that their "cultural" attitudes towards sexual matters is at the root of the extreme AIDS epidemic in Africa. My dear African Bishops before you criticize us look in the mirror. Seems to me Ghandi said something like that.
Posted by: herbert on Friday, 8 April 2005 at 10:36pm BST