Thursday, 9 March 2006

View from Fleet Street

This View from Fleet Street column by Stephen Bates of the Guardian appeared in the CEN on Friday 3 March. It is republished by permission of the Church of England Newspaper.

“There is always something new coming out of Africa,” wrote Aristotle more than 2,000 years ago and he didn’t mean new in a nice way. To him it meant strange and undesirable.

I hope more than a few Anglicans would agree with him at the moment. Scarcely a week seems to pass without some new scandal, some outrageous statement or appalling behaviour coming out not of sundry regimes, militias, or armed factions, but from an institution that is fast becoming equally corrupt, the Anglican Church itself.

These are not just any old Anglicans but bishops and archbishops, with scarcely a peep coming out of anyone, least of all their allies in the evangelical constituency, with only a few honourable exceptions. For the rest it is almost as if embarrassment, political correctness and maybe even the fear of upsetting those on the same side in the gay row causes a reticence that is close to cowardice.

Two recent, egregious, examples: last week our old friend Archbishop Akinola waded into the inter-religious violence in Nigeria with all the abandon of a man waving a lighted match near a pool of petrol, threatening Muslims that they did not have a monopoly of violence. Who knows what the effect, but shortly afterwards Christian mobs in Onitsha started hacking people to death with machetes. The only people I can find who condoned the Archbishop’s remarks were on American blogsites. Even his fellow bishop Cyril Okorocha thought he was being inflammatory.

Akinola’s hot on the Bible but he doesn’t seem to have read the Beatitudes recently. Of course Christians were already under attack from Muslims but that’s no excuse. The injunctions in Matthew 5 really take on their meaning when they are most difficult.

This of course is the archbishop who has just ostentatiously praised the Nigerian government for introducing draconian and inhumane legislation against homosexuals, thereby breaking that great holy writ of conservative evangelicals, Lambeth 1.10, but that’s old news.

Let’s take as our second example one of Akinola’s allies, the Archbishop of Central Africa, the Most Rev. Bernard Malango, another primate who is quick to criticise the gay mote in England and America but slow to recognise the beam in his own eye.

He’s the man who recently absolved, without trial, Bishop Nolbert Kunonga of Harare. The list of 38 charges against the good bishop, who is a crony of Robert Mugabe, brought against him by his own black parishioners, include little matters such as incitement to murder, intimidation, ignoring church law, mishandling funds and proselytising for Zanu PF from the pulpit. He has also occupied a farm and evicted 40 families from a local village. A couple of months ago he even licensed the acting vice-president of Zimbabwe Joseph Msika, a man on record as saying that whites are not human beings, to act as a deacon of the church.

Archbishop Malango decided Kunonga had done nothing wrong after the case faltered in Zimbabwe, because of a little spot of harassment and intimidation. Thanks to that, he has not a stain on his character and is going round saying the charges were all got up by whites.

But that’s not all Archbishop Malango’s been up to. He’s also been persecuting the Rev. Nicholas Henderson, the London vicar who was chosen last summer as Bishop of Lake Malawi by members of the diocese impressed by his many years of close association and work with them.

Henderson was rejected by the archbishop as being of “unsound faith” because he had been secretary of the Modern Churchpeople’s Union, a body so subversive that it has been undermining the church for only the last 108 years.

There were also unsubstantiated smears about the vicar’s sexuality, allegedly poured into the archbishop’s ear by conservative evangelicals and bloggers – they’d certainly know all about him – which were so devastating that even Mr Henderson’s own assurances of his theological, ethical and sexual orthodoxy and, perhaps more to the point, the support of his impeccably evangelical bishop, Pete Broadbent, were not enough to save him.

Mr Henderson has recently been back to Malawi but was told he should not enter a church during his stay. Local Anglicans have been demonstrating in his support and insisting they want him rather than an old buddy of Malango’s whom the archbishop wishes to instal instead.

Now these men have all been very hot on western decadence. They want the American Episcopal Church, and especially Gene Robinson, banned from the next Lambeth Conference, though I don’t think Robinson has ever threatened violence against anyone.

All I know is that if Rowan Williams bans the bishop of New Hampshire but extends invitations to men such as Akinola, Malango and Kunonga, Anglicanism will have ceased to be a communion worthy of the name. It will be, to coin a phrase, spiritually dead.

Stephen Bates is religious affairs correspondent of the Guardian.

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Thursday, 9 March 2006 at 11:05am GMT
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Anglican Communion
Comments

Now that's a useful summary of what's going wrong over there, thanks for posting.

Out of interest: is there a concise requirement that makes a church a member of the anglican communion? Is it simply "in communion with the See of Canterbury", as http://anglican.org/church/AngliComm.html would suggest?

I'm trying to assesss the extent to which Akinola's playing with his church's constitution constitutes withdrawal already.

Posted by: Tim on Thursday, 9 March 2006 at 1:39pm GMT

One should always acknowledge friends, don't you think?
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/8.30/relrpt/stories/s1585664.htm
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/jensen-condemns-sin-of-homosexual-acts/2006/02/02/1138836371964.html
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/church-imperilled-by-gays-archbishop/2006/02/02/1138836372860.html , which includes:
"In an attack on liberals, Dr Jensen told Anglican Mainstream members that the Bible said homosexuality was a matter of life and death, therefore "we would be cowards if we do not make clear this is an issue of life and death". Dr Jensen, who returned to Australia yesterday..."(1/2/2006)
http://www.gaynz.com/news/default.asp?dismode=article&artid=3190

Posted by: Cheryl Clough on Thursday, 9 March 2006 at 3:34pm GMT

Hey Tim:

Being in communion with the See of Canterbury has always been the thing that defines who is in the Anglican Communion and who is not. Nigeria is still in communion with Canterbury, but the change they made in their constitution has made it so that they can break communion with Canterbury later if they want to. They have loaded the gun but have not yet pulled the trigger.

In reality, Canterbury holds all the cards. Unfortunately, ++Williams has not been a very strong leader in all of this (in my opinion). I would like to see him come up with a practical plan. For example, he could acknowledge to groups of provinces (one including the ECUSA and the other including Nigeria) that are both in communion with him but do not interact with each other very much. Something like that needs to be proposed. The Anglican Communion will never be what it was before 2003.

Peace to all!

Posted by: Wade Bond on Thursday, 9 March 2006 at 3:48pm GMT

Excellent piece by Bates -- thanks for the link!

Posted by: Prior Aelred on Thursday, 9 March 2006 at 5:51pm GMT

Thanks Wade. That's pretty much what I thought was going off.

Posted by: Tim on Thursday, 9 March 2006 at 5:58pm GMT

Stephen Bates seems an uncommonly sensible man. I think his closing remark says it all: "All I know is that if Rowan Williams bans the bishop of New Hampshire but extends invitations to men such as Akinola, Malango and Kunonga, Anglicanism will have ceased to be a communion worthy of the name. It will be, to coin a phrase, spiritually dead."

Indeed. My concern is, and continues to be, that Anglicanism is dying, and that the ABC, by his failure of leadership, is the deepest wound of all.

Posted by: Eric MacDonald on Saturday, 11 March 2006 at 1:12pm GMT

At least our UK friends are getting information about these situations. In the USA, the news media tend to ignore all of this. Perhaps a bit more publicity, here, might cool the supporters of those Sub-Sahara Archbishops and give encouragement to the moderates and liberals.

Is there any plan for review of the positions on violence and reverse-racism of these men and their associated Bishops and clergy? After all, if choosing a gay Bishop in the USA is cause for concern by everyone in the Anglican communion, these are at least equal concerns.

The Anglican Communion will continue. Perhaps, as has happened before, even if there are divisions, it will have added strength. Perhaps, having some divisions may even add strength.

Mel

Posted by: Mel on Saturday, 11 March 2006 at 7:02pm GMT

Wade, ealier you stated that "In reality, Canterbury holds all the cards." Technically that would be true but in reality it doesn't seem that way, the Global South group of African Anglicans headed by Archbishop Akinola seems to be calling the shots, at least to some degree.

Akinola is starting his own Anglican Church in America to compete with the ECUSA? He's inciting violence against Muslims in Nigeria? And he's not ben censured ot rebuked by Canterbury.

Why? Over half of the world's Anglicans are African, and that could be up to 70 percent by 2025 according to some estimates.

"We no longer need to look to Canterbury to become Christians," Akinola said during a recent U.S. tour. "If they want to create a new religion, good luck to them, but we don't want a new religion. What we have already is good enough for us."

Who's in charge of the Anglican Communion? And who's calling the shots?

Posted by: Daniel on Monday, 13 March 2006 at 4:19pm GMT
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.