Tuesday, 15 September 2009

support for the seven bishops

As happened previously with a Communion Bishops statement, a number of priests who are affiliated with Communion Partners have endorsed it. In this case, they pledged to fulfill the “non-episcopal requests” made by those bishops who met with the Archbishop of Canterbury on Sept. 1.

The Living Church reports that the 74 priests lead parishes with a collective baptized membership of 60,000.

See Communion Partner Rectors Endorse Bishops In Meeting With Archbishop of Canterbury

The undersigned Communion Partner Rectors [and] associate Clergy commend and support the initiative taken by the Communion Partner bishops in meeting with the Archbishop of Canterbury on September 1, 2009 in order to discuss and clarify the present circumstances of The Episcopal Church, as well as his understanding of what entities might be eligible to sign and adopt the Anglican Communion Covenant.

We echo the commitment of the bishops “to remain constituent members of both the Anglican Communion and The Episcopal Church.” Our desire is also to use the present situation as an opportunity to make manifest our commitment to becoming “a part of a ‘Covenanted’ global Anglican body in communion with the See of Canterbury.”

In support of the bishops, we commit ourselves to the five non-episcopal requests listed in their report of September 7, 2009…

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Tuesday, 15 September 2009 at 8:39am BST | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: ECUSA
Comments

"....In support of the (7) bishops, we commit ourselves to the five non-episcopal requests listed in their report of September 7, 2009.....

(5). We will seek to build ministry relationships with dioceses and congregations in other provinces of the Anglican Communion..."
- Statement of 'Communion Partner Rectors' -

A fairly innocuous statement really; except, perhaps, for the underlying threat contained in item (5) of the 'non-episcopal requests' !! ! whatever that may mean. (How can requests made by a group of bishops be referred to in this way?)

Is this statement a sign of ongoing rebellion on the part of an ACI-stimulated coterie, when or if TEC decides not to sign up to the Covenant? And what sort of collegial relationships will these rectors elect to make with 'congregations and dioceses of other provinces'?. And would it be allowable - if they were still bound by fealty to TEC? Perhaps they need to be challenged on this

Posted by: Father Ron Smith on Tuesday, 15 September 2009 at 10:10am BST

Same old yadah, yadah, yadah.

Posted by: Kurt on Tuesday, 15 September 2009 at 3:57pm BST

Hmmm, seems like for the conservative Anglicans at least, being in first track community with Canterbury (post-covenant signing of course) will translate into being clearly antigay, period. That is how our 'mind of the communion' has been read, and surely how being in the new fangled coveant communion will be?

I think all the antigay stuff has to get, right out into the open, a developmental stage. Only by being overtly antigay and in the process, doing some damage that you might later be able to perceive in retrospect, will offer any Anglican metanoia possibilities, that listening half of the otherwise antigay Lambeth resolution.

Rowan Williams is daft if he think that sort of anti gay stuff changes in an orderly, locked steps fashion. Even locally in a single parish, let along globally.

I do wish we could grow by study and discernment and listening; but the change is often not all that possible via these vehicles. Again, just look at RW. He studied, discerned, listened - and even wrote about how he'd changed his mind; but it makes no difference to his leadership for first track antigay church life.

Growing out of being antigay is the sort of long term change that getting off drugs involves for dependent users. You have to grasp emotionally-cognitively that the piety buzz you have been giving yourself has taken its toll; and that continuing to buzz on antigay juice will keep doing the same (by now familiar) damage. Some change, some do not.

Posted by: drdanfee on Tuesday, 15 September 2009 at 6:57pm BST

"The undersigned Communion Partner Rectors [and] associate Clergy commend and support the initiative taken by the Communion Partner bishops in meeting with the Archbishop of Canterbury on September 1, 2009 in order to discuss and clarify the present circumstances of The Episcopal Church, as well as his understanding of what entities might be eligible to sign and adopt the Anglican Communion Covenant." - Communion Partners

From the above, where the ACI-affiliated Rectors pledge their fealty to both TEC and the Covenant, it will be very important as to whether the emerging draft of the Covenant is such that TEC is able and willing to become a signatory.

The hint here, is that if TEC finds itself unable to sign up to the Covenant, the 'Communion Partners' will transfer their allegiance to the Covenant - unless their relationship to TEC, as their provincial Church, forbids this.

To have made such a declaration in advance of the new draft of the Covenant would seem provocative, to say the least. However, there is still time for the re-drafting of the Covenant to attempt to accommodate what TEC and like-minded provincial bodies might require - for their participation.

Posted by: Father Ron Smith on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 at 11:30pm BST
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.