Saturday, 25 April 2015

opinion

Lisette Thooft interviews Linda Woodhead for Volg Nieuw W!J: “Liberal Religion is Hardline Religion”.

Chrissy Sykes Thoughts from a baby Christian

Posted by Peter Owen on Saturday, 25 April 2015 at 11:00am BST | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Opinion
Comments

The headline of the Woodhead essay is very misleading. Does not seem to have any echo in the story.

Posted by: Ann on Saturday, 25 April 2015 at 5:39pm BST

You have to read almost to the end, but that phrase does appear - the gist of it being that it's harder to be compassionate and merciful than it is to be hateful and judgmental, and in that sense liberal religion demands more than conservative religion.

Posted by: Jo on Saturday, 25 April 2015 at 10:51pm BST

Chrissy Sykes lists more than a few faux pas' (hope this is correct!). And, at her church, no one seems to mind. I guess if there were significant doctrinal differences, kindergarten may turn to Year 9 high school. Some people will never 'fit' a conventional church service. Where do those people go?

Posted by: Pam on Saturday, 25 April 2015 at 11:14pm BST

Woodhead's interview had a lot of good things in it, but was frustratingly confusing, too. I trust her writing is more coherent, and want to check that out.

Mercy, I just pray that Chrissy Sykes, having put her email address in her (short but lovely) essay, doesn't get trolled by the "You're an idiot, talking to an imaginary sky daddy" crowd. God bless, Chrissy, and welcome! :-)

Posted by: JCF on Sunday, 26 April 2015 at 1:25am BST

The track record of 'conservative' religion doesn't bear out Woodheads argument. Street Pastors, Christians Against Poverty, The Message Trust, TEAR Fund, there are stacks of non-liberal Christians and Christian organisations acting with love and mercy on a daily basis. It's much more complex than caricaturing liberals as merciful and conservatives as haters.

Posted by: David Keen on Sunday, 26 April 2015 at 2:08pm BST

I agree with JCF, particularly as regards this comment: "Secularism is not enough, because it condems all religion; it does not differentiate between some forms which are positive and some forms which are negative." Secularism is, simply, the separation of church and state. It doesn't "condemn" religion, it's neutral.

Not only is it jaw-dropping that someone as knowledgeable as Woodhead doesn't know this, as a standard-bearer for liberal religion, she ought to be defending secularism. When the president of Modern Church takes a position against interest, and alienates her natural allies in the process, you see why liberal Christianity's in such dire straits.

Posted by: James Byron on Sunday, 26 April 2015 at 11:14pm BST
Post a comment









Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.