Thursday, 28 June 2012

Anglican Covenant: some updates

First, a report from Australia Brisbane defers the Covenant. The motion they passed in diocesan synod was this:

That this Synod recommends to the General Synod that it:

  • Affirm the commitment of the Anglican Church of Australia to the Anglican Communion.
  • Affirm its readiness to engage with any ongoing process of consideration of the Anglican Communion Covenant
  • Request clarification from the 15th meeting of the Anglican Consultative Council as to the status and direction of the Covenant Process in the light of the position of the Church of England.
  • Urge upon the Instruments of Communion a course of action which continues to see reconciliation and the preservation of the Communion as a family of interdependent but autonomous Churches.

Second, Paul Bagshaw has two further articles discussing the recent meeting of the “Standing Committee of the Anglican Communion” which we reported here.

In both these articles, he suggests that there may be conflicts between English charity law (which is what governs the ACC in its constitution) and the interpretations of the Anglican Covenant which the Standing Committee has adopted.

In the first article he also comments on the recent GS1878: report by the Business Committee on the reference [of the Covenant] to the dioceses.

Posted by Simon Sarmiento on Thursday, 28 June 2012 at 9:16am BST | TrackBack
You can make a Permalink to this if you like
Categorised as: Anglican Communion | Church of England

"Request clarification from the 15th meeting of the Anglican Consultative Council as to the status and direction of the Covenant Process in the light of the position of the Church of England."

- from the Diocese of Brisbane statement -

Can one not love the Diocese of Brisbane's tongue in cheek wording here?

The very notion of waiting upon the ACO's thoughts about the Church of England's rejection of the Anglican Covenant process, before committing one's-self to it, is absolutely priceless - and, incidentally, quite legitimate.

Why should the dispersed Provinces of the Communion vote for a restrictive covenant process that would impinge on their right to independence from such an imposition - when even Mother Church has rejected the same?

Posted by: Father Ron Smith on Thursday, 5 July 2012 at 12:40am BST

Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia has rejected the proposed Covenant, but subscribed to Sections 1 - 3 as providing a useful starting point for consideration of our Anglican understanding of the church.

Also affirmed its commitment to the Communion, and committed to used processes similar to those of Section 3 if another church has concerns about this church's actions

Posted by: Tony Fitchett on Monday, 9 July 2012 at 8:24am BST

I have reported the Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia vote here:

Please make any comments specific to New Zealand there and not here.

Posted by: Peter Owen on Monday, 9 July 2012 at 11:15am BST
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.