Updated on Friday to add questions 36 and 37 and their answer below the fold
In the Questions session at this week’s General Synod the Secretary General was asked about turnout in the recent elections to Synod. In reply he gave these figures, together with those from 2010 for comparison.
|Highest turnout clergy||67.96||(Birmingham)||75.00||(Ely)|
|Lowest turnout clergy||45.60||(Hereford)||43.20||(Bristol)|
|Highest turnout laity||72.10||(Guildford)||64.13||(Chelmsford)|
|Lowest turnout laity||29.82||(Hereford)||37.83||(Lincoln)|
|Highest turnout clergy||69.00||(Sodor & Man)||73.90||(Sodor & Man)|
|Lowest turnout clergy||39.86||(Liverpool)||46.50||(Liverpool)|
|Highest turnout laity||56.96||(Chester)||54.70||(Sodor & Man)|
|Lowest turnout laity||34.74||(Liverpool)||36.30||(Liverpool)|
Mr David Lamming (St Edmundsbury & Ipswich) to ask the Chair of the Business Committee:
Q36 Despite the fact that electors had nearly three weeks to return their voting papers in the recent General Synod election, the turnout in most dioceses was depressingly low—under 50% for the House of Laity election in 22 of the 33 dioceses that have posted the figures on their websites, and under 40% in four dioceses (Manchester 35.39%, Oxford 38.28%, Peterborough 30.79% and Salisbury 35.44%). Will the Chair of the Business Committee confirm that the Elections Review Group will look into the reasons for the low turnout and also bring forward legislative proposals to make provision for online voting in 2020 as agreed by Synod at the November 2013 Group of Sessions?
Mr Clive Scowen (London) to ask the Chair of the Business Committee:
Q37 Has the Business Committee considered bringing to the new Synod early in this quinquennium options as to how the electorate for the House of Laity might be formed for future elections, in time for any change which the Synod might consider appropriate to be implemented in time for the 2020 elections, and, if not, will it now do so?
The Revd Canon Sue Booys to reply as Chair of the Business Committee:
A With permission, I will take these questions together. All these issues are important potential areas for consideration by the Elections Review Group, a sub-committee of the Business Committee, which will be established early in this new Quinquennium. Synod members wishing to request further work on these and other matters should write to the Clerk to the Synod, requesting that they be tabled for consideration when the Elections Review Group is re-formed, which is likely to be early in 2016.